＃22

我认为这是荒谬的零件填充的底层应该以任何方式妥协，使筏子分离更容易。

我使用第三方ABS，剥离比率将被设置为25，然后将该部分的效果是底部的填充弱，并且当我移除支撑屋顶时，通常从部分拆卸的整个周边串。
This seems ridiculous that the solution to making the raft easier to remove is adjusting the infill and probably small changes in the support roof and raft.

需要做些什么是保持筏恒定的结构，并简单地调节到该部分和部分之间的气隙。将零件填充物填充在100％或99％的填充物中，并改变剥离比，使得它是零件和筏/支撑屋顶之间的气隙。这将使部分更好，并且可能更容易删除以及奖金。

＃23

@Jason-TTyou should know that I actively unrecommended/do not recommend the UP300 and advise other people caution in purchasing tiertime products due to how poorly these issues are being handled

1就像
＃24

@Jason-TTits now September. Is the new preview of CatFish slicer available yet?

＃25.

@jothamb.

肯定现在它一定很明显，你是刺激的受害者。：眨眼：

Anyway. they did release a revision yesterday, but I don’t think it has the new slicer. Certainly it doesn’t seem to print any differently, though I am still yet to do the tests.

＃26

这个名字似乎一直有点......不祥：眨眼：

我确实检查了最新发布之前的发布，但错过了版本的更改，因为我只是查看Upstudio版本号的最后3位数字。将很快测试它。

＃27

Well, I can’t connect to the printer after the update… Its always taken a few attempts maybe a printer reboot but now its not working at all:frowning_face:我尝试重新启动机器，重新启动Upstudio并重新连接多次。

Can’t test it when its like this.

Anyone else having the same issues? I’ve also tried to use the “clean cache” under the settings menu I doubt it could be related but I thought I’d do that anyway.

＃28

I had similar issues and a few reboots were required. Now I get a lot more air printing for some reason. Anything over 100g has about a 50% chance of air printing.：皱眉：不确定它是否是新的程序或其他东西。

＃29

OK, just tested latest software. It’s actually worse than before…

The gap is massive compared to previous prints.

＃30

Just had a facepalm moment. I forgot to put the printer onto the new router. doh!：man_facepalming：

它现在完美地连接。

The surface bonding is not fixed at all, like you say its as bad as before, perhaps even worse now.

＃31

I was in a rush and didn’t screen capture it but when installing I got a dire warning about “older” printers. It was truncated so instead of stating what the problem may be it just showed the beginning of the sentence and then three dots. Something like “Warning if used with older printer this may…” Not very helpful.
欧文S.

＃32

IMG_20190903_072234044
IMG_20190903_072234044 948×711 221 KB

I don’t see any gaps at all!: face_with_monocle:

UPStudio 2.6.29.627

Stock settings. 0.15mm layers, normal speed. 0.4mm nozzle. Tiertime black ABS.

＃33

What’s your line width using those settings? The default for 0.15 mm?

我的理解是，这个问题主要与挤出宽度变量有关。我减少了通常直到0.40毫米的，以便在顶部和底表面上打印的较薄线，从而更好地填充空隙，但仍然没有完美。

希望与这款新的切片机，鲶鱼，填充重叠变量完全解决。

＃34.

顶层看起来有很多空隙。没有触摸边缘的填充区域。其他切片器没有这个问题，也会让边缘更加厚。

＃35.

用于使用刺激物来修复填充和周长之间的差距。调整重叠百分比。

％E5％9B％为％E7％89％87
％E5％9B％为％E7％89％87 563×552 6.18 KB

If you change the Profiles option to “-1”, then the number of perimeter will become 1-2-1-2 pattern long the Z axis, this will also improve the structural integrity of the print.

＃36.

Nice, that looks interesting,
谢谢，
欧文S.

＃37.

@Jason-TT您能否让软件团队修补填充重叠问题？我不确定这是否是在v2.5相比，在向上工作Studio V2.6中出现的一些错误或出现问题。

This is a critical slicing issue that needs to be fixed so users can print parts properly, especially those who have no intentions of using Catfish slicer. I’m sometimes flicking back and forth between UP Studio v2.6 and v2.5 so I can produce parts where the infill actually bonds properly to the perimeter shell. This is不是或者至少不应该是挤出宽度问题。

3喜欢
＃38.

Sorry to bump this, but has the infill issue been resolved? There is nothing mentioned in the UP Studio v2.6.31.627 changelog to indicate any fixes have been applied and test prints still show gaps that aren’t as pronounced when using 2.5 - I want to make sure it’s not just me.

我同意@ Jimmy44033.- there may be a time when I’ll swap to Catfish but at the moment I just want the slicer to work and produce professional results, especially when I’m trying to sell some of the stuff I print.

The compatibility chart doesn’t seem to be updated either (it still says 2.6.29 for my Box+), not that I completely understand why we need to use a different version of sofware for each printer - the latest version seems to recognise and work on all my printers (Box+, Box and Mini 2) albeit with the infill issues. Is the chart there for some but not others?

@Jason-TTis Studio still being worked on (especially the infill problem) or has the development focus moved to Catfish?

1就像
＃39

@Jason-TTany response, progress or info on this “bug” (other than use Catfish)?

I did some tests with variations on my most commonly used settings using Studio 2.6.31.627 on an UPBox (despite the compatibility warning) using UP Fila Black ABS.

Tried to mimic the part used in@jothamb.帖子（有点）
图像

图像
图像 800×800 167 KB

图像
图像 800×800 155 KB

图像
图像 800×800 152 KB

图像
图像 800×800 141 KB

图像
图像 800×800 135 KB

Lowering the extrusion width seemed to help a little in my case, but it’s not “perfect” and the gap could be a little tighter.

＃40

We only the increased the overlap rate in TPU profile for 2.6.31. In the next version we will increase the overlap rate in other materials and open up this option in the material profile of UP Studio, so user could adjust base on their needs. please be aware that too much overlap may cause over dumping and could cause unknown adverse effects.

2喜欢
＃41

因此，对于使用工作室的人来说，可能会根据TPU基础TiVertime材料创建个人资料，并从那里修改其他材料。

My question is, is it really that difficult to put out a version of UP Studio that has an increased overlap value for all custom materials made in Studio?
只是一个简单的更新，可以推出并让我们和其他用户快乐的打印部分，没有恼人的空白。

1就像